Assess the source change
Identify affected lessons, media, assessments and variants. Record ownership or source-file gaps before committing to an edit.
Coordinate language variants, source changes, terminology, local review and maintained course assets through an explicit content-change register.
Prepare a courseware brief →A course library needs a visible relationship between source versions and local variants. We scope translation coordination, media changes, review and republishing handover around a maintained asset register. Language capacity, reviewer availability, rights and target formats are confirmed for the engagement.
Identify affected lessons, media, assessments and variants. Record ownership or source-file gaps before committing to an edit.
Coordinate terminology and local examples with named reviewers. Keep approvals tied to the actual version, rather than carry an old approval forward silently.
Deliver the agreed output, version references and release notes. Identify what is superseded, deferred or awaiting a decision.
First assess source availability, rights, authoring format, language requirements and review capacity. Scope the editable changes and target output; do not assume a published package contains every source asset needed.
Use a change register linking the source update to affected lessons, languages, reviewers and release decisions. Show approved, blocked and deferred variants separately.
No unlimited allowance is implied. Agree change volumes, review rounds, turnaround assumptions and the process for additional work in the project or continuing content scope.
Connect source changes to the lessons, media, language reviewers and outputs that need attention. Use observed update and review effort to assess maintainability, with retained rights and source availability explicit.
Bring your source material, audience and target environment.